实验情况 我们将该模型应用到两组数据的序列标注上:
1)集中式的重点信息抽取:在刑事案件的裁判文书中,对犯罪事件的具体描述提供了整个案件的判决依据,有很重要的分析价值。这些描述往往集中出现,但是由于整个裁判文书的长度多变,案件复杂程度不一,对这些描述的高效抽取既需要快速地略过无关信息,又需要在信息出现的段落进行精细的分析。下图示例中红色及蓝色的文字表示被Zooming Network抽取出来的部分,不同的颜色则代表不同的犯罪事件标签。
被告人张三,男,1978年3月17日出生,现因涉嫌犯盗窃罪,于2005年9月21日被羁押,同年10月28日被逮捕,现羁押在北京市海淀区看守所。
北京市海淀区人民检察院指控被告人张三犯盗窃罪,于2006年6月9日向本院提起公诉。本院依法组成合议庭,公开开庭审理了本案。北京市海淀区人民检察院指派检察员武军出庭支持公诉,被告人李忠士到庭参加诉讼。现已审理终结。
经审理查明:
被告人张三于2001年4月1日,在本市海淀区车道沟10号院东99丙号楼3单元地下室,撬门入室窃取被害人A的现金人民币1 700元,窃取被害人B的诺基亚5110型手机1部、爱立信398型手机1部,共计折合人民币2 667元。赃款、赃物均未起获。
被告人张三于2001年8月13日,在本市海淀区万寿路甄家坟集体宿舍,翻窗入室窃取被害人C的现金人民币7 300元、纯金戒指1枚,共计折合人民币8 400元。现赃款、赃物均未起获。
综上,被告人张三共盗窃作案2次。
────────────────────────────
The defendant Zhang San,male,born on March 17,1978,was detained on September 21,2005 for suspicion of theft and was arrested on October 28 of the same year.He is now detained at the Haidian District Detention Center in Beijing。
Haidian District People's Procuratorate accused the defendant Zhang San guilty of theft,on June 9,2006 prosecution to this court.Our court formed a collegiate bench and heard the case openly.Beijing Haidian District People's Procuratorate appointed inspector Wu to appear in court to support the prosecution,the defendant Li Zhongshi to attend the proceedings.Now trial ended。
After trial found:
On April 1,2001,defendant Zhang San stole the victim's cash of RMB 1,700 in the basement of Unit 3,Building 99,Lane 10,Lane 10,Lane,Haidian,Haidian,to steal the victim's Nokia 5110 A mobile phone,Ericsson 398 mobile phone 1,a total of 2 667 yuan equivalent.Stolen money,stolen goods have not played。
On August 13,2001,the defendant,Zhang San,stole the victim's C for 7,300 yuan in cash and 1 piece for the pure gold ring in a rented apartment in Zhenjiafen,Wanshou Road,Haidian District,on August 13,2001.The total amount was equivalent to 8,400 yuan.Now stolen money,have not been stolen goods。
To sum up,the defendant Zhang three commoner theft 2 times。
2)分散式的重点信息抽取:在知识产权纠纷案件的裁判文书中,案件的核心是原被告双方争议的焦点。这些信息随着对纠纷的描述不定位置地出现,出现形式也复杂多变,进一步要求模型对处理路径的灵活选择。下图示例中红色及蓝色的文字表示被Zooming Network抽取出来的部分,不同的颜色则代表不同的争议焦点标签。
本院认为,原告张三是涉案发明专利的专利权人,该专利至今在有效期限内,法律状态稳定,应受法律保护。任何单位或者个人未经专利权人许可不得实施该专利,否则应承担相应法律责任。
综合本案当事人的诉辩意见,本案争议焦点主要在于以下两个方面:1.被控侵权产品是否落入涉案专利权利要求1的保护范围;2.被告的侵权责任应如何承担。
────────────────────────────────────────────
The court held that the plaintiff Zhang San was the patentee of the invention patent involved in the patent so far,and the patent so far has a stable legal status and should be protected by law.Any unit or individual may not implement the patent without the permission of the patentee,or shall bear the corresponding legal responsibility。
Based on the opinions of the parties involved in this case,the focus of the dispute in this case lies mainly in the following two aspects:1.Whether the accused infringing product falls into the protection scope of Claim 1 of the patent involved; 2.How the defendant's tort liability should be borne。